This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What should we do with gcc.target/i386/pr12329.c?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:35:40 -0700
Subject: Re: What should we do with gcc.target/i386/pr12329.c?
References: <6dc9ffc80909230917h33245e2ch7ff376bac3c50d69@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/23/2009 09:17 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:

Hi,

Since we now allow regparm(3) for nested functions, gcc.target/i386/pr12329.c
fails. Should we remove it or change it into run-time test for both
ilp32 and lp64?

A runtime test that both direct and indirect invocations of foo succeed.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What should we do with gcc.target/i386/pr12329.c?
  - From: hjl.tools

References:
- What should we do with gcc.target/i386/pr12329.c?
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]