This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [trans-mem] do not inline wrapper functions

On 09/10/2009 10:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: 
The CALL_CANNOT_INLINE_P bit should be set on the CALL_EXPR, not the
FUNCTION_DECL, which is what we have when we parse the attribute.

I'll try the DECL_UNINLINABLE thing Matz suggested. 

I think the DECL_UNINLINABLE thing won't be too bad in practice.
I think wrappers will normally be used with external library
functions, which couldn't be inlined anyway.



r~

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]