This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][Ada] arm-linux sjlj port
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Matthias Klose <doko at debian dot org>, Martin Guy <martinwguy at gmail dot com>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>, Ludovic Brenta <ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org>, Geert Bosch <bosch at adacore dot com>, Olivier Hainque <hainque at adacore dot com>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu dot se>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:54:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][Ada] arm-linux sjlj port
- References: <4A832F30.3000708@debian.org> <19081.10792.105185.512212@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <1250976793.17842.404.camel@localhost> <1251517614.5049.91.camel@localhost> <19097.768.413069.836610@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <19099.37987.927752.847987@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <1252319138.5049.1764.camel@localhost> <1252319604.17746.2.camel@e200601-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20090907104033.GF95143@adacore.com> <1252320705.5049.1778.camel@localhost>
> Default_Bit_Order : constant Bit_Order :=
> Bit_Order'Val (Standard'Default_Bit_Order);
>
> But you told me earlier that this style was to be avoided in system-*
> files.
Right, I'm not concerned about have two files. I'm concerned about having
two ports, and nobody to build/test/maintain them (or one of)!
> Up to now I've had access only to armel systems so I cannot
> test the armeb side.
Right, that seconds my point.
Arno