This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: stack-protector guard location

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:28:06 -0700
Subject: Re: stack-protector guard location
References: <20090827225535.CF70E4050F@magilla.sf.frob.com> <4A971CE3.2060404@redhat.com> <20090828001251.1FC4645B02@magilla.sf.frob.com> <m3ocq0nehl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey wrote:

> Users will still need a name for it to refer to it from the debugger.

I don't see a problem with giving it a name.  We can always define an
obscure namespace.  For example, __GCC_stack_guard.  I think it's
reasonable for us to claim __GCC_ as a special subspace of the
implementation namespace.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: stack-protector guard location
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- Re: stack-protector guard location
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: stack-protector guard location
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: stack-protector guard location
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]