Re: [v3] revamp header pedantic testing

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

> I am getting some failures of these new (moved?) tests on
> ia64-hp-hpux11.23. Have you heard of failures on any other platforms?

You are the first.
 
> FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for
> excess errors) 

Probably header inclusion or macro guards changes?

> FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/all_no_exceptions.cc (test for excess
> errors) 
> FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test
> for excess errors)

These are new. Please send me the log output for these excess errors.
 
> I think the problem may be due to the fact that ia64-hp-hpux11.23 has
> only a partial c99 implementation.  What is wierd is that if I compile
> all_pedantic_errors.cc (which has nothing but '#include
> <bits/extc++.h>' in it) using the just built compiler from its
> installed location, it works fine. But it I compile it the way the
> test run does (with the -B's and -I's, out of the build directory),
> then it fails.  I am trying to figure out where the two compilations
> diverge but I was wondering if you had any thoughts on this problem.

PCH?

-benjamin