This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:49:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
References: <4A7C8E31.3020207@redhat.com> <4A7FEECC.1010302@redhat.com> <4A7FF7A3.4080402@redhat.com> <4A80175D.1000206@redhat.com> <4A801CC8.1070200@redhat.com> <4A8039FD.80404@redhat.com> <4A8041DA.6010008@redhat.com> <4A8044CF.7060103@redhat.com> <4A804E73.8040205@redhat.com> <4A805494.3050105@gmail.com> <4A80536A.3030008@redhat.com>

Dodji Seketeli wrote:

> 
> Ah, for the pubname section, you are correct yes. I was talking about the
> DW_AT_name attribute of the constructor DIE in the .debug_info section. Not
> about constructor name in the .debug_pubnames section.

  Oh, excuse me!

    cheers,
      DaveK

References:
- [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [RFA] gcj PR debug/40990
  - From: Dodji Seketeli

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]