This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Alpha/VMS CRTL names and 64bit Malloc'ing

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Douglas B Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:16:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Alpha/VMS CRTL names and 64bit Malloc'ing
References: <4A7E0A15.7090201@gnat.com> <4A7EFFB9.4060206@redhat.com> <4A7F02F4.70101@gnat.com>

On 08/09/2009 10:10 AM, Douglas B Rupp wrote:

Richard Henderson wrote:
Why are you putting a large block of code inside DO_CRTL_NAMES
when you've a perfectly good VMS protected function to put it in?
Or is this a vms.h vs vms64.h issue?
Yes, 32 vs 64 bit issue.


Ah.  Well, I'd prefer it if you re-organized things such that
you didn't have to have that large block of code in the header,
but I won't require that you do.

Patch is ok.

r~

References:
- [PATCH] Alpha/VMS CRTL names and 64bit Malloc'ing
  - From: Douglas B Rupp
- Re: [PATCH] Alpha/VMS CRTL names and 64bit Malloc'ing
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Alpha/VMS CRTL names and 64bit Malloc'ing
  - From: Douglas B Rupp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]