This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR40011 - Problems with -fwhole-file


On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:

> Dear Tobias and Richard,
> 
> 
> > Remains:
> > a) Some fine-comb work plus changelogs
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >
> > b) Finding out what does wrong with derived->backend_decl being not
> > record_type, cf. PR 40011
> >
> > Answer by Richard:
> > 12:24 < richi> Tobias__: easy fix
> > 12:25 < richi> s/cgraph_finalize_function (...,
> > false)/cgraph_finalize_function (..., true)/g
> >
> > [cgraphunit.c: "If NESTED is true, then our caller cannot stand to have
> > the garbage collector run at the moment."]
> >
> > 12:25 < richi> of course we only get to the next ICE ...
> 
> Richi, Does your final comment #38 on PR40011 indicate that you have
> given up on this?

Yes - the testcase is too big for my little machine. The garbage
collector fixes are nevertheless necessary.

> > c) Finding out why the for static one can currently not inline without
> > running into trouble
> 
> I must go back to the testcase that triggered this and take a look.

ISTR that the decls were not properly unified in the caller vs. the
callee.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]