This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Fortran] RFC: Patch to support STDCALL etc. (PR 34112) * PING *


On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:22:22PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:11:46PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > Craig Powers schrieb:
> > > Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > >> I updated the patch (only gfortran.texi) based on Daniel's and Craig's
> > >> comment.
> > >> OK for the trunk?
> > * PING *
> > 
> > Updated Crag's nits, otherwise unchanged. Can someone finish reviewing
> > it? If not, what is needed to do so?
> > 
> > (I hope to get this patch tested by our Windows users - and I hope that
> > we can also get a cygwin/mingw test case; I cannot do this myself as I
> > do not have Windows.)
> > 
> > > Did you intentionally stick to the original wording, or overlook my
> > > suggestion?
> > The latter.
> > 
> > > Stray '"' character that I presume was accidentally copied from my
> > > previous comments.
> > Fixed.
> > 
> > Tobias
> 
> The test cases are failing on FreeBSD.  All of the stdcall stuff
> is irrelevant on FreeBSD so one can xfail the tests; however,
> I don't know if this is something to be concerned about with 
> other targets.
> 

It may be a screw up on my part.  I applied the new patch
over the new patch and forgot to clean out any new files.
'svn revert -R .' appears to ignore new files.

-- 
steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]