This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch for Regressions from "[rfc] -gdwarf-3 and DW_OP_call_frame_cfa"
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
- Cc: hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:48:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: patch for Regressions from "[rfc] -gdwarf-3 and DW_OP_call_frame_cfa"
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:23:37 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2009-06/msg00080.html
>
> Revision 148408 is the cause.
Which is exactly the commit of RTH's patch to which I replied.
To be clearer (I hope) to other quick readers, the doubt I have
is regarding *further* regressions, exposed once the testsuite
is fixed to emit e.g. -gdwarf-2 -g1 instead of -gdwarf-21.
brgds, H-P