This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I mean for gcc developers. ?It's a good point that --param only
>> takes numeric arguments. ?My point is simply that this option, if we
>> include it, would never be for end-users of gcc (who are, yes,
>> themselves developers), and should be named and documented accordingly.
>
> -fdbg-cnt= (which is another option that is for developers only
> and is far riskier than -fcompare-debug, stopping some optimization passes
> at arbitrary spots) isn't documented that way either.
That just means there it's lots of cleaning up to do.
Ciao!
Steven
- References:
- [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug
- Re: [trunk<-vta] Re: [vta,vta4.3,trunk?] introduce -fcompare-debug