This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Use $(COMPILER) to build objects


On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>
>> > ?(There is no -static-libstdc++ option
>> > so you can't readily make the C++ compiler link with static libstdc++ when
>> > desired.)
>>
>> ? I must be misunderstanding what you're getting at; it's implied by plain old
>> -static I thought? ?Certainly appears to WFM:
>
> The point is to create a portable binary (one that does not require shared
> libraries from the compiler used to build it) by linking with static
> libstdc++/gmp/mpfr/cloog/ppl but dynamic libc (glibc barely supports
> static linking and it's certainly a bad idea and does not help in making a
> portable binary). ?While -static-libgcc and -static-libgfortran exist,
> -static-libstdc++ doesn't
>

I'd like to see -static-libstdc++:


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]