This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR target/39942: Nonoptimal code - leaveq; xchg %ax,%ax; retq


On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is the patch I am checking in.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>> --
>> 2009-05-18 ?H.J. Lu ?<hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? ?PR target/39942
>> ? ? ? ?* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avoid_jump_misspredicts): Replace
>> ? ? ? ?gen_align with gen_pad.
>> ? ? ? ?(ix86_reorg): Check ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD instead of
>> ? ? ? ?#ifdef ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_ALIGN.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?* config/i386/i386.h (ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD): New.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/i386/x86-64.h (ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD): Likewise.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?* config/i386/i386.md (align): Renamed to ...
>> ? ? ? ?(pad): This. ?Replace ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_ALIGN with
>> ? ? ? ?ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD.
>>
>
> This patch causes a bootstrap failure on i386-darwin because
> ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_ALIGN and ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD are defined at
> different times. On darwin ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_ALIGN is not defined
> but ASM_OUTPUT_MAX_SKIP_PAD is defined.
>

Why is it a problem? I can't test it with a cross compiler. Please show
the error message.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]