This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] [RFC] Reworking type-bound procedures

From: Daniel Kraft <d at domob dot eu>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:26:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] [RFC] Reworking type-bound procedures
References: <49DCBEEC.1000102@domob.eu> <339c37f20904211346t5bb7c0b8id94a0f71f7786689@mail.gmail.com> <49F0A4C7.1050201@domob.eu>

Daniel Kraft wrote:

Currently running a regression-test on GNU/Linux-x86-32. Ok for trunk if successful? Or should we go for fortran-dev instead first?
Did it regtest???? It looks OK for trunk to me.
It did. I'm doing a fresh update and build/regtest now, and will commit if successful tomorrow (if there aren't any more comments).

Updated and re-tested fine, committed to trunk as rev. 146733.

--
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Kni-Mon-Pri

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] [RFC] Reworking type-bound procedures
  - From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] [RFC] Reworking type-bound procedures
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] [RFC] Reworking type-bound procedures
  - From: Daniel Kraft

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]