This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR39665, alignment problems


On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Janne Blomqvist
> <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel Kraft wrote:
>>> Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> this patch hopefully works around the alignment problems reported in
>>>> PR39665. The problem is that nowadays when we read a floating point
>>>> number, it's stored into the result variable with an assignment. This
>>>> works fine for formatted reads, as the result variable is the final
>>>> variable passed in from the user code, so it always is sufficiently
>>>> aligned. However, for list formatted and namelist reads, we used a
>>>> temporary char* buffer, and some platforms like IA-64 or HP-PA are picky
>>>> about alignment and crash. This patch modifies list formatted and
>>>> namelist reads of real and complex type. Unfortunately the fix isn't as
>>>> clean as I'd wish, since after the parsing it turns out that the value
>>>> must be saved anyway in order to handle repeat counts.
>>>>
>>>> Regtested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> Ok. ?Thanks for working on this!
>>
>> Thanks for the review. However, after thinking about this some more
>> myself, I came to the conclusion that considering the requirement to
>> handle repeat counts, my other proposal to just align u.p.value is better.
>>
>> Hence I instead committed the attached patch as obvious (r145852).
>>
>> --
>> Janne Blomqvist
>>
>> 2009-04-09 ?Janne Blomqvist ?<jb@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>> ? ? ? ?PR fortran/39665
>> ? ? ? ?* io/io.h (st_parameter_dt): Add aligned attribute to u.p.value.
>> ? ? ? ?* io/read.c (convert_real): Add note about alignment requirements.
>>
>>
>
> This caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39702
>

and

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39709

It may only happen on 64bit targets.



-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]