This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [atom]: PATCH: reg_mentioned_by_mem_p with DF

>> I don't remember exactly, but I think Jakub is right.  I don't think DF
>> is kept up to date by the last passes, especially after BLOCK_FOR_INSN
>> is unset.
> 
> As far as I know, the df-scan info is also OK in final. But I may be wrong.
> 
> The question is then: Which is wrong? That DF is not available, or the
> patch?  I vote "the patch".

Me too. :-)  And I suspect that it may actually not matter that DF is
not available, though I do not know atom branch very well.

If I hadn't already muddled myself in the cond-optab stuff, I'd try and
see which ports actually do split after md reorg.

Paolo
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]