This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:22:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW
References: <f865508f0903290709t386e05ecga0b4a6f2d01ef4d8@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000903300218t4b8197d7r326a06d39eafa4f1@mail.gmail.com> <49D091AB.9080801@gnu.org>

> No, it's really that the patch is older than this usage of
> TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW (March 2008 vs. May 2008) and while I
> bootstrapped it for safety, I was really thinking that no one was
> introducing no new usages.

Sorry, probably my mistake.  Out of curiosity, why did it take 2 years to get 
rid of the flag?

2007-01-11  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>

	* tree.h (TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW): Obsolete.  For the time being,
	treat TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW as a synonym of TREE_OVERFLOW.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] eliminate TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]