This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:36:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs
- References: <495B2DAB.1000501@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <339c37f20901030920l21a1e552j5de728395df601e0@mail.gmail.com> <49CFADD3.2030005@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:20:19PM +0200, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> >Dear Tobi,
> >
> >>Built and tested on i686-darwin. Ok?
> >
> >Yes indeed - it's OK by me. This raises the question as to whether we
> >should wait for 4.5? I guess that we could cite a virtual regression?
>
> I've committed the patch (the one from three months agos about wrong
> warnings with labels) to 4.5 after running it thorugh the testsuite again.
>
> Cheers,
> - Tobi
Thanks!
--
Steve