This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: pretty-ipa merge 3 (well lto merge ;): inline_failed reason as enum


On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> [ xf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01444.html ]
>>
>> The new file cif-code.def is missing from the posted patch.
>>
>> How does this interact with i18n, i.e. how are the messages from the
>> .def file supposed to end up in the .pot/.po?
>>
>> Ciao!
>> Steven
>
> I am attaching the file. ?Sorry for that.
> I didn't really think of .pot generation, is there way to say that
> even .def should be scanned?

The .def files are always scanned too (see e.g. diagnostics.def and
params.def).  But I'm not sure where the N_() marker is supposed to
go. Not in the .def file, it seems.

Ciao!
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]