This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix for PR/39548

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:05:10 +0100
Subject: Re: Fix for PR/39548
References: <522e93240903241102rd2c0a1cn4bab064e3a26bb3@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000903250523q2a931633rf16123556a637f82@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50903250541t4e05280dm3a14d83e6c71e79d@mail.gmail.com> <200903251602.20806.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:02:20PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I disagree, the testcase is fine.  I know where it is coming from and
> > I doubt we'll get much smaller than this.
> 
> But at least this should be tried.  I see no reason why you can allow someone 
> to bypass rules that have been followed (in some cases painfully) by dozens 
> of developers.  Please reconsider.

Yeah.  I've started delta on it some minutes ago and got it so far down from
164952 bytes to 137844 bytes, but the delta is still running.  I'm not
saying all testcases can be simplified to below 1KB, but some attempt should
be done to minimize the testcase.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li

References:
- Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Xinliang David Li
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Fix for PR/39548
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]