This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM] hard VFP calling convention support [2/3]
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:06:58 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ARM] hard VFP calling convention support [2/3]
- References: <1228755497.17641.20.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <1228755759.17641.27.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 05:02:39PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok): Improve test for neon
> availability.
Improved a little too much?
> @@ -1273,6 +1287,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_vfp_ok {
> proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok { } {
> if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
> return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_neon_ok object {
> + #include "arm-neon.h"
> int dummy;
> } "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp"]
> } else {
It's arm_neon.h.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery