This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Tobias SchlÃter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:44:18 +0100
Subject: Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
References: <49B4201A.8030409@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <m3r615h2mw.fsf@google.com> <49B6F1DD.1040102@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <m3k56xszs3.fsf@google.com> <49B786C2.4030400@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <m363igruri.fsf@google.com>

> The top level configure script does apply extra substitutions to adjust
> @if statements in Makefile.in when generating Makefile, by adding lines
> to ac_extra_sub.  I wonder if the '+' charaacters in libstdc++-v3 could
> be confusing that somehow.

No, it should not.  And I inspected the Makefile.in on the branch, and
it seems okay (thus ruling out commit mistakes or anything like that).
But indeed comparing the Makefiles you and Tobias have is a good ideea.

Paolo

References:
- [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Tobias SchlÃter
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Tobias SchlÃter
- Re: [gcc-in-cxx] Get past stage1 on darwin
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]