This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] thread impl shrinkage

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:20:16 -0800
Subject: Re: [v3] thread impl shrinkage
References: <20090213150706.7c26dadc@balbo.artheist.org> <4348dea50902150703k47bb627lab5494c5d171cac3@mail.gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Is there any need for __r in thread::join() or could NULL be passed to
> gthread_join?

For POSIX function NULL can and should be passed.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmYXOAACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHR0DQCghlJPABKbFSsmyzVOlKL62rRE
oQwAoLPK0pW40pW1PB8NkpTwmLsgHttF
=R5Q2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- [v3] thread impl shrinkage
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] thread impl shrinkage
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]