This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rguenther at suse dot de
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:31:01 +0100
Subject: Re: Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0902081520140.11836@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <200902090735.51826.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <10902091127.AA06248@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>

> I didn't miss that.  I agree that it's a good idea because of the
> semantics of string literals, but the key here was that the subset
> relationship wasn't being properly set in the array case.  This should work
> with or without the Gigi change.

I was talking about the other part of Richard's 2008-06-11 change, that for 
get_alias_set.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs
  - From: Richard Kenner

References:
- Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Ada and TBAA and arrays vs. VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs
  - From: Richard Kenner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]