This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++, diagnostic, obvious?] Typo in fix for PR 35058
2009/1/29 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 2009/1/28 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Manuel, Gaby, all,
>>>>
>>>> which certainly looks very strange and inconsistent with the other
>>>> changes in the same patch. I'm pretty sure the below was really
>>>> intended, I'm tempted to commit it as obvious, but I'll wait a couple of
>>>> days, to be sure...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I am not so sure about this. Is this actually a permerror or a
>>> pedwarn?
>>>
>> It is a pederror, ...
> read it permerror, of course. Sorry.
I mean, should it actually be a permerror or a pedwarn? If it is not
an extension we support, then it is a permerror. Then your change is
ok for me (plus the comment update). The testcase would be nice as
well. This is a regression in either case.
Cheers,
Manuel.