This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Adam Nemet <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:29:03 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
References: <18806.13045.677719.384942@foo.home> <m3eiywr6n4.fsf@google.com> <18808.8028.906784.542142@ropi.home> <200901241424.58309.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <18812.52517.644889.379453@ropi.home>

Adam Nemet <anemet@caviumnetworks.com> writes:

> 	* c.opt (Wpacked-bitfield-compat): Change init value to -1.
> 	* c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): If -W*packed-bitfield-compat
> 	was not supplied then set warn_packed_bitfield_compat to the
> 	default value of 1.
> 	* stor-layout.c (place_field): Check warn_packed_bitfield_compat
> 	against 1.

This is OK.

Thanks.

Ian

References:
- [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Don't ignore packed on char bitfields (4.0 regression)
  - From: Adam Nemet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]