This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Fix for crash in compute_antic

>>> This patch fixes a crash in compute_antic. 

>> This fixes part of PR 33649.
> In fact it fixes all of them.

That's good to know.  I still don't think this is a regression, though;
as far as I know, the test-case would fail on that combination of
options since the introduction of the options.  So I think it would be
ill-mannered to check it in at this point.  But, if someone can find a
regression in here, it's a straightforward patch.

I couldn't figure out, when looking at the test case, why it didn't
occur without disabling things.  It looked like the problematic code
would still get run.  Are we just getting lucky?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]