This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:02:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
References: <20081214033809.GA5031@bromo.med.uc.edu> <430D1AE2-4B7D-4556-9024-275DB6C768DC@apple.com> <20081214171719.GA26336@bromo.med.uc.edu> <49455DB4.9060907@gnu.org> <20081214200150.GA27171@bromo.med.uc.edu> <49456880.4070307@gnu.org> <20081214210716.GA27624@bromo.med.uc.edu> <20081214212903.GA27651@bromo.med.uc.edu>

> This seems to work okay. The two 21674.cc tests are run on darwin
> and pass without generating XPASS output in dejagnu while the
> 2.cc test is not run on darwin and is marked as UNSUPPORTED.

Cannot approve it, but it seems okay.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth

References:
- [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [PATCH]: Don't XFAIL 21674.cc on darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]