This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: patch to remove the old RA

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
Cc: law at redhat dot com, Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:05:11 +1100
Subject: Re: RFA: patch to remove the old RA
References: <493F27A2.3080301@redhat.com> <20081211.100859.247166216.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <49413E15.1080801@redhat.com> <4941A093.9070908@redhat.com>

Hi Vlad

> I've checked more targets (ppc64 and itanium) and found one more 
> mistake.  Here is an additional patch (it should be applied after the 
> first patch I sent day before yesterday) and a new modified ChangeLog 
> entry.  Because the patch itself is big, I am sending only additional 
> patch and not sending the new version of it.  But I'll send the final 
> version of the patch in any case after approval for reference purposes 
> if somebody wants to restore the old RA in future.

It might be easier if you just check the final patch in and post the
revision number.  It's easy to extract the patch out of svn.

Cheers, Ben

References:
- RFA: patch to remove the old RA
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: RFA: patch to remove the old RA
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: RFA: patch to remove the old RA
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: RFA: patch to remove the old RA
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]