Re: 4.3.2 PR37945 RTEMS Socket Binding Mistake

[Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>]

Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Joel Sherrill, 2008-12-11 :
>
>   
> > > This looks to me like a very large amount of code duplication,
> > > significantly increasing the maintainance burden.
> > >       
> > This code is dead after this branch so how much maintenance
> > is going to happen?
> >     
> > >  I think it would be
> > > better to backport the changes made on trunk to accomodate this
> > > difference (from rev. 135709).
> > >   
> > >       
> > That would impact every target and not be picked up
> > by the ACATS so would require testing by hand AFAIK.
> > This seems like a lot of churn for very little benefit.
> >     
>
> Fair enough. OK as far as I'm concerned as long is we agree (and
> document) this is only for the dead 4.3 branch.
>   
That was my intention 100%.  The automatically
generated binding on the trunk is OK.

I don't have a checked out 4.3 branch.  I would appreciate
it if you one of guys could commit it.

Thanks.

--joel