This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Add MIPS nonpic tests to testsuite


Catherine Moore <clm@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Adam Nemet <anemet@caviumnetworks.com> writes:
>>> Catherine Moore <clm@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>>> 	I've tested with mips-linux and also with mips-sde-elf.  The testsuite
>>>> doesn't currently pass with the mips-sde-elf configuration due to extra
>>>> compiler/linker messages, though.
>>> Can you elaborate?  It would be nice if the new tests passed on the
>>> configurations that they're run on.
>> 
>> I imagine it was:
>> 
>>   %{fPIC|fpic|fPIE|fpie:%{!mips16*:-KPIC}}
>> 
>> in sde.h:SUBTARGET_ASM_SPEC.  So we assemble -fpic code as -mabicalls,
>> even though GCC hasn't generated that.
>> 
>> If so, it looks like an SDE bug to me, and it's good that the testsuite
>> has picked up on it.  -fpic really ought to be link-compatible with
>> -fno-pic, if it's accepted at all.
>
> Actually, the problem that I'm currently seeing is:
>
> /tmp/cc6v0Red.s: Assembler messages:^M
> /tmp/cc6v0Red.s:26: Warning: No .cprestore pseudo-op used in PIC code^M
> /tmp/cc6v0Red.s:26: Warning: Macro instruction expanded into multiple instructions^M

Yeah, this would be a symptom of the problem I mentioned.
The assembler thinks that it's compiling abicalls code,
but GCC has compiled non-abicalls code.

IMO, we should just remove that line from sde.h:SUBTARGET_ASM_SPEC.

Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]