This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: C++ PATCH for c++/37234 (defaulted functions)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:15:47 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFA: C++ PATCH for c++/37234 (defaulted functions)
- References: <493587CC.5050204@redhat.com>
Jason Merrill wrote:
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. As before, I think that fixes for bugs in
> new functionality should be allowed in the regression-only phase. OK to
> check this in? Can I also continue to check in bug fixes for other
> C++0x issues?
Yes, I think this kind of fix is OK during this phase. However, I think
that you should err on the side of caution; better to ship with a new
C++0x feature broken than with a core C++89 feature broken.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713