This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:04, Rafael Espindola <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?
Yes, that's likely. IIRC, at the time that we run
pass_ipa_free_lang_specifics, functions don't yet have gimple_body()
set, but they should have DECL_SAVED_TREE set. Doug, that's something