This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [LTO]How should be resolve a DECL with no function body?
> That was the first thing I tried. It may be possible. It currently
> creates other problems as BINFO is assumed to exist and is used by the
> folder. It may be a matter of fixing the folder, as I'm not convinced
> that BINFO is really necessary, but I haven't asked the C++ folks
> about it.
Just removing the decls without body from it should be enough for this bug, no?
Rafael Avila de Espindola
Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland | Registration Number: 368047