This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Rainer Orth <ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:42:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
References: <200811061305.03568.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200811071137.24591.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1226145815.14300.1319.camel@localhost>

> Test results for c,ada sparc-linux are now available here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-11/msg00710.html
>
> FAIL:	c410001 common
> FAIL:	cb20001 common
> FAIL:	cb4004a common
> FAIL:	cb41003 common
> FAIL:	cc3305c specific
> FAIL:	cc70a01 specific
> FAIL:	cd1c04e common
> FAIL:	cxa4016 specific
>
> Compared with sparc-solaris around the same revision:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-11/msg00647.html
>
> FAIL:	c410001 common
> FAIL:	c41328a specific
> FAIL:	cb20001 common
> FAIL:	cb4004a common
> FAIL:	cb41003 common
> FAIL:	cd1c04e common

I confirm on Solaris 9, except for c41328a; I'll take a look.

Rainer, what's the failure mode of c41328a on your SPARC/Solaris box?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]