This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:25:44 +0100
Subject: Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
References: <200811061305.03568.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <yddtzakn57l.fsf@manam.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

> I think it's considerably clearer to use the += idiom found e.g. in
>
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00026.html

"considerably clearer" is an overstatement (and this sentence is itself an 
understatement :-).  I actually think that the separate approach is better, 
you see at once what LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS is made up of.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [Ada] Consolidate target pairs for SPARC
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]