This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
- From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: "Dodji Seketeli" <dodji at redhat dot com>
- Cc: jh at suse dot cz, "Gcc Patch List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Jan Hubicka" <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:36:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/27574 (PING)
- References: <48C056E3.1020305@redhat.com> <48DA9B09.7060001@redhat.com> <48DCDAA5.6000809@redhat.com> <48DD597D.6090705@redhat.com> <20080926215724.GB746@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <48E24B64.3060608@redhat.com> <48EA68F0.60905@redhat.com> <48EA92AA.6080105@redhat.com> <48EDAD24.2020004@redhat.com> <490EDFBF.1000206@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello Jan (and maybe to any other callgraph maintainer out there),
>
> This is a ping for a review of the patch I posted at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00367.html .
Hm. What is the effect on text size for C++ applications? We do not
need the function text itself but only its debug information - the debug
information for the decl, not the text, correct?
Richard.