This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37688: Relax "used before typed" check
- From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
- To: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: "Daniel Kraft" <d at domob dot eu>, "Fortran List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:33:58 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37688: Relax "used before typed" check
- References: <48F1BC36.firstname.lastname@example.org> <48F1C2A1.email@example.com>
Which other compilers accept this feature and why is it so
unreasonable to place declarations in standard conforming order?
I am completely against bending the standard on the grounds that
something is "used in real world code". As very least, do a standard
check on it and preferably don't do it at all.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Tobias Burnus <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Daniel Kraft wrote:
>> Regression test running on GNU/Linux-x86-32. Ok for trunk if no
> OK. Thanks for the patch.