This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls

From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
To: "Daniel Kraft" <d at domob dot eu>
Cc: "Fortran List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:28:10 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls
References: <48E75085.7040909@domob.eu> <339c37f20810040727xfd412a7nc23276ed8cc49447@mail.gmail.com> <48E785D7.1060802@domob.eu>

Daniel,

> Do you think I should re-use that flag instead?  That could be possible.

I assumed that it wouldn't work - which symbol would you attach the error to?

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls
  - From: Daniel Kraft

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls
  - From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/37638: Possible ICE-on-invalid for typebound calls
  - From: Daniel Kraft

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]