This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Separate processor model from ix86_tune

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>, ubizjak at gmail dot com, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:18:49 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH: Separate processor model from ix86_tune
References: <303e1d290809251841y74e46103h43ad09cdb02a7c0e@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80809251937l6d0b186embef7e0e5b0d04d22@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 07:37:21PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> ix86_cpu is a variable internal to x86 backend where the cpu attribute is
> used for scheduler. It is used to implement -mtune=XXX. It has nothing
> to do with how  -mtune=XXX should work.

Then please call it something else.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Separate processor model from ix86_tune
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Re: PATCH: Separate processor model from ix86_tune
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: PATCH: Separate processor model from ix86_tune
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]