This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: "Danny Smith" <dansmister at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Kai Tietz" <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>, "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Kai Tietz" <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:19:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
References: <b609cb3b0809020830q37080398s50017f0b7af6519a@mail.gmail.com> <OF25B81408.004E8110-ONC12574B9.0034533E-C12574B9.0034BD36@onevision.de> <9c03c2dd0809031951n2beddb15wbef09b66a491c5@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/3/08, Danny Smith <dansmister@gmail.com> wrote:
> >        * gthr-win32.h (CONST_CAST2): Added.
>
> This part is not needed  since it was fixed at  r139927
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-09/msg00085.html

I don't mean to question things, but I am instead more curious.  Why
define it here as opposed to ensuring that system.h gets included?
That way, you don't have the same thing defined in two different
places.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Danny Smith

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [PATCH] Build libgcc_s on Windows
  - From: Danny Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]