This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
- From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: sje at cup dot hp dot com
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:35:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
- References: <6dc9ffc80808060840m3cd0337bx4533b7d0f179d0fa@mail.gmail.com> <1218841014.744023.20838.nullmailer@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <de8d50360808151637g54c8b0ecu6d31e1f1880f30f@mail.gmail.com> <20080816034130.GA30155@lucon.org> <1219075713.440.1.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If the stack temp size doesnt matter, this patch should work.
>>
>>
>> H.J.
>> ----
>> 2008-08-15 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>> * expr.c (emit_group_store): Don't assert stack temp mode size.
>
> This patch worked for me. It fixed the problem and caused no
> regressions on ia64-hp-hpux11.23.
This patch just changed the failure from being an ICE to wrong code on spu-elf:
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-11
c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski