This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] c++0x <mutex> and <condition_variable>

From: "Chris Fairles" <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
To: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:49:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [v3] c++0x <mutex> and <condition_variable>
References: <fac6bb500809021438h329d7137n61bb77da160e7f27@mail.gmail.com> <fac6bb500809021445n6ac7643bm718cbbfce1ad9abe@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Chris Fairles <chris.fairles@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Chris Fairles <chris.fairles@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok. I think these are basically ready as a first draft. Nearly
>> complete implementations of both. Still missing the generic
>> lock/try_lock.
>>
>> One thing that's unclear to me is how to determine the targets in the
>> testcase's dg-do run option. I'm just using what I think Benjamin (or
>> whoever did the initial commit) was using. I'm not sure how to go
>> about determining whether its still correct or not.
>>
>> Tested x86_64.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
> Small fix for unused vars in testcases (for -Wall -O2 testing).
>
> Chris
>

Updated changlog re: last fix. Sry for the noise.

Chris

Attachment: Changelog_mutex_cond_var.txt
Description: Text document

References:
- [v3] c++0x <mutex> and <condition_variable>
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [v3] c++0x <mutex> and <condition_variable>
  - From: Chris Fairles

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]