This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c

From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:08:33 -0700
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
References: <6dc9ffc80808060840m3cd0337bx4533b7d0f179d0fa@mail.gmail.com> <1218841014.744023.20838.nullmailer@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <de8d50360808151637g54c8b0ecu6d31e1f1880f30f@mail.gmail.com> <20080816034130.GA30155@lucon.org>
Reply-to: sje at cup dot hp dot com

> 
> If the stack temp size doesnt matter, this patch should work.
> 
> 
> H.J.
> ----
> 2008-08-15  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> 
> 	* expr.c (emit_group_store): Don't assert stack temp mode size.

This patch worked for me.  It fixed the problem and caused no
regressions on ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com

References:
- PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: H.J. Lu
- PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: sje
- Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: PING: PATCH: middle-end/36701: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]