This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Chris Fairles wrote:
> I stumbled upon this C 200x proposal:
> http://www.twinsun.com/tz/timeapi.html
> (from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/time)
>
> I haven't been following any developments on the C 200x front and a
> quick search didn't find an accepted version of this proposal so I
> don't recommend waiting for the C-folk to do the dirty work for us ;)
The C1x charter forbids invention - anything added to C1x must first have
been implemented and deployed. Unfortunately, some people have got the
bad idea of smuggling inventions into C1x by first adding them to C++0x as
inventions, then getting them implemented in C++0x implementations, then
claiming that a C++ implementation is sufficient to add a feature to C.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
- References:
- [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.
- Re: [PATCH, v3] Potential solution to librt issue.