This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: XFAIL failing FRE tests and status of other regresions
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:12:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH]: XFAIL failing FRE tests and status of other regresions
> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:20:20 -0400
> From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin@dberlin.org>
> 2008-07-20 Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-7.c: XFAIL.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-8.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-9.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-13.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-14.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-17.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-15.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre1.c: PASS.
For consistency, I applied this as obvious; it fails everywhere
according to gcc-testresults@ and was coincidental with the
above, apparently for the same reason. Sorry, I missed this one
before when nagging.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/data-dep-1.c: XFAIL.
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/data-dep-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/data-dep-1.c (revision 138006)
+++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/data-dep-1.c (working copy)
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
outermost "k" loop: the 4 comes from the instantiation of the
number of iterations of loop "j". */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "4, \\+, 1" 0 "ltrans" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "4, \\+, 1" 0 "ltrans" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "ltrans" } } */
brgds, H-P