This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ping: [patch] Link libobjc_gc with libgcjgc_convenience.la

From: Andrew Thomas Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:01:16 -0700
Subject: Re: ping: [patch] Link libobjc_gc with libgcjgc_convenience.la
References: <18555.33301.881890.968218@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <m3iqv4zf33.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 17, 2008, at 8:48, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:

"Matthias" == Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
Matthias> Original patch at [1], suggestions from [2] implemented in [3]. Matthias> Matthias
Matthias> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg01341.html
Matthias> [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg01380.html
Matthias> [3] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00275.html
It seems reasonable to me, but I can only approve the boehm-gc parts.
Those are ok if the libobjc parts are approved.

The libobjc parts are ok.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

thanks,
Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Tree broken for non-boehm-gc targets (was: ping: [patch] Link libobjc_gc with libgcjgc_convenience.la)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- ping: [patch] Link libobjc_gc with libgcjgc_convenience.la
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: ping: [patch] Link libobjc_gc with libgcjgc_convenience.la
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]