This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
- From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: "Chris Fairles" <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:40:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
- References: <fac6bb500807010546u641d3c27g35d7fb8e68fa9a3f@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Chris Fairles <chris.fairles@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached is a patch that implements most of n2615. Whats the word on
> its acceptance status? I haven't made full blown test cases and such
> for anything in <chrono>. The clocks aren't portable. I just put them
> in as placeholders that "worked for me" since I'm not really sure how
> to go about integrating posix/linux specific functions.
>
> Pending some feedback, I can tidy up the patch, add testcases etc.but
> I want to make sure that some variation of n2615 has in fact been
> accepted into the std.
The cons_overflow.cc and ops_overflow.cc testcase fails on spu-elf as
that target does not have denorms for float (it does for double
though).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski