This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments

From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dave dot anglin at nrc-cnrc dot gc dot ca
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:28:19 -0700
Subject: Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
References: <20080605143000.GB26686@caradoc.them.org> <200807031703.m63H34N18609@lucas.cup.hp.com> <20080703180431.GA32305@caradoc.them.org> <20080703182243.GB32305@caradoc.them.org> <1215110021.11439.5.camel@localhost.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20080703231111.GA15870@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: sje at cup dot hp dot com

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:11 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> But from a different backtrace.  Could you try this patch?  It fixes
> your testcase, and does not perturb the code used for e500 floating
> point as far as I can tell.

I will put it in my tree for overnight bootstrap testing but I may not
have the results until next week.  It depends on whether or not I look
at it over the holiday weekend.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: Use float stack slots for e500 promoted arguments
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]