This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Fix -Wc++-compat and -Wcast-qual warnings [d-g]*.c

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, iant at google dot com
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:04:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix -Wc++-compat and -Wcast-qual warnings [d-g]*.c
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0806241930100.5287@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <206fcf960806250000k540864edw3afa14b204ffb0ad@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
<gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> This patch eliminates -Wc++-compat and -Wcast-qual warnings in [d-g]*.c.
>> It uses the new alloca and obstack allocator macros I recently added to
>> libiberty to minimize the use of explicit casts.
>>
>> Tested in conjunction with my previous warning cleanup patches:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01546.html
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01547.html
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01478.html
>>
>> With these patches together, we're down to about 125 warnings left.
>>
>> No regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, okay for mainline?
>
> This looks good to me; Richard or Ian, OK?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

References:
- [PATCH]: Fix -Wc++-compat and -Wcast-qual warnings [d-g]*.c
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: [PATCH]: Fix -Wc++-compat and -Wcast-qual warnings [d-g]*.c
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]